Which is so completely cool its not even funny.

Just hope they dont have a case of the Weezer syndrome where the videos make the band…..

@nineinchnails: ? http://www.nin.com/?id=96673

which is a link to this:

aHHHHHHH new music sooooooooooon!!!!

Florence + The Machine’s album Lungs. Its so beautiful and Im so mad it took me over a year to sit down and really listen to it. Im ashamed to admit it took ‘Dog Days Are Over‘ to be used for the promo of the network debut of Slumdog Millionaire on Channel 4 back in January to make me pick the album up. Totally and utterly in love with it. Beautiful.

I love my chicks with guitar thing. If you love Kate Bush or Grace Slick, you will adore Florence and the Machine…

Oh and if you still doubt her, check her collaboration with Dizzie at the Brits in February

Best. Commercial. EVER!!!!
Why cant we get anything like this in the UK?

A Rothschild giraffe mugs for the camera

Makes me excited if theres a new record out. Even if its without Melissa and Eric

She did this ALL live.  Amazing. No lip synching, no help from ‘backing vocals’ etc. A straight performance.

“When I do it [on tour], I don’t have lights above me. Tonight, there were lights above me, so it almost went into a strobe thing, and I actually did get a little turned around. I thought … I was going to fall on my nude butt. But I worked it out. I would say that no one ever has another excuse to lip sync.”

Amazing. She totally gets loads more of respect from me (and maybe ill venture to listen to more of her music…..) Plus its pretty beautiful to watch. Very Cirque du Soleil-esque…

They hail from the land of the free, the home of the brave, a place where it is said anyone can prosper regardless of colour, creed or religion. But dozens of Americans have tried in recent years to gain asylum in the UK by claiming they were persecuted in their homeland, according to figures released to the Guardian under the Freedom of Information Act.

Home Office statistics show that between 2004 and 2008, 45 Americans submitted asylum applications to the UK Border Agency claiming they had fled the US and were unable to go back because they had a well-founded fear of persecution. Fifteen Canadians also applied. All 60 were turned down.

A US government source said the American applications were most likely submitted by self-declared “political refugees” claiming they faced discrimination under the last administration. The applications from the US peaked in 2008, the final year of George Bush’s presidency, when 15 Americans submitted asylum claims.

Between 2004 and 2008 there were 132,640 asylum claims made in the UK, according to government statistics.

The Home Office refused to reveal the rationale behind the claims or why they were refused, saying a manual search of the records would be required, exceeding the time limit for Freedom of Information requests.

But on various online forums, people claiming to be American refugees have outlined their cases. One Texan hoping to be allowed sanctuary in Scotland claimed he had been “persecuted as a political dissident against US government war-mongering”.

Liza Schuster, an asylum expert from the department of sociology at City University, said: “I don’t know the details of those cases, but assume the US citizens are deserting before being sent to somewhere like Afghanistan. With the Canadians I’m really not sure. It is, as is clear from the numbers, pretty unusual – if only because it is relatively easy for those people to leave their countries and settle elsewhere. Why not just apply for a work visa and renew and then apply for leave to remain?

“As someone who would not find admission to European countries too difficult, it would only make sense to claim asylum if you feared extradition back to Canada or the US, or if there was some reason you might be refused entry. It is interesting – I’d be curious to know more – not least because in spite of what the law books say, granting asylum is a criticism of the originating state.”

According to the Home Office figures, most of the US and Canadian applicants were aged between 18 and 59, though a small number of American asylum seekers were over 60.

The Refugee Council, the largest organisation in the UK working with asylum seekers and refugees, said it had helped 18 American and two Canadian asylum seekers between 2004 and 2008. The adults ranged in age from 29 to 59 with a mean age of 44. The Americans had nine dependent children aged under 16.

“In this time this group of clients attended 40 advice sessions and mainly came to see us regarding their entitlement to UKBA asylum support, and issues associated with destitution,” said a spokeswoman.

Donna Covey, the chief executive of the Refugee Council, said: “No country is safe for every person all of the time. Those with a genuine need for protection, whatever country they are from, should have the right to claim asylum in a place of safety.”

A small number of Americans have successfully claimed asylum abroad over the past few decades. In 1997 the Netherlands granted asylum to Holly Ann Collins, together with her three children, when they claimed to be fleeing domestic abuse. The family had spent three years living in four different Dutch refugee camps before their application was approved.

In June 2008 Texan mother Chere Tomayko and her two daughters were granted asylum in Costa Rica, also on the grounds of abuse.

After America went to war in Iraq in 2003 a number of US soldiers deserted and crossed the border to Canada, where they tried to claim asylum.

For a number of years Private Bethany Smith has been fighting to stay in Canada, claiming she was persecuted in the army because she is a lesbian.

Smith, who now goes by the name Skylar James, told Canadian authorities she was repeatedly harassed and threatened with death, then denied an honourable discharge because her superiors wanted to send her to Afghanistan. In November a senior judge ordered Canada’s immigration and refugee board to look again at her case.

In November 2004 I was at in an British Airways lounge at JFK airport and while waiting to board a flight to Manchester, UK I was watching John Kerry give his concession speech. Disappointed with the outcome, I called my partner in the UK and jokingly said ‘ Can I apply for political asylum while I’m there?’
Apparently I wasn’t the only person with the same idea.

According to Freedom of Information Act, 45 Americans (and 15 Canadians) applied between 2004 and 2008. I find that so interesting. Were things THAT bad back home for people? You think, like the UK, America is a place to find safety, not run from it.  I know the whole lefty versus righty thing can get heated, but to the point to move to country? Why not apply for asylum in Canada?

It seems, strange. They author cited one case of a person from Texas and his outline of WHY he should be granted Asylum seekers status. I guess there are places in Texas that can be overwhelming and not willing to at least listen to another beliefs, but  you can move to other places inside of the United States thats more in line with your own views. Thats what so great about America. No need to change countries, just change states or even counties.

The only bit about the article that bothered me was this statement:

Liza Schuster, an asylum expert from the department of sociology at City University, said: “I don’t know the details of those cases, but assume the US citizens are deserting before being sent to somewhere like Afghanistan. With the Canadians I’m really not sure. It is, as is clear from the numbers, pretty unusual – if only because it is relatively easy for those people to leave their countries and settle elsewhere. Why not just apply for a work visa and renew and then apply for leave to remain?

Does she not know how HARD it is to apply and receive a work visa in the UK? Even during the good times, it is incredibly difficult for an American (or non-eu citizen) to be receive a UK work permit.  Now a days with the Governments further restrictions on foreign workers, with the point system and EU residents having priority over jobs, its impossible.  Well it is, UNLESS you’re  someone of an extremely skilled nature and unique in your field, you will be guaranteed that Tier 2 visa.

I think what makes Ms Schusters statement so hard to handle, as she is a ‘expert’   she should have knowledge of that fact and how difficult it is to gain entry into the UK with valid right to remain. I bet there are loads of asylum seekers who have tried to apply for a Tier 2 visa and didn’t qualify. The only way to get their families to safety was to go down the Asylum route.

I think that statement, for me, is what makes this whole article so shocking and not so, ‘Oh I wasn’t the only one with the sorta-clever idea’

I havent updated in a while because the guys have left me a wee bit disheartened (DVD preview screening only being in the US, 2 shows announced – but in NYC) and a few other things have left me feeling not so, um, great about the guys.

Ill still continue posting about the guys, but as for this blogs focus, I dont think it will be NKOTB anymore. If I completely move away from the guys, I will keep all posts archived for reference. Maybe have them re-directed to another url.

http://perezhilton.com/2010-01-23-kings-of-leon-get-new-deal

And it’s almost unheard of!

Kings of Leon have left Columbia Records for Warner Brothers where they will be paying to record their own albums!

The band will pay half the recording costs from their own pocket and in return have more control and get a bigger share in the profits.

“Kings of Leon are one of the few bands on the planet who have enough heft to negotiate such a favourable deal,” said a source. “It is virtually unheard of but it shows how keen Warner Brothers were to have them on their books.”

Normally, artists are given an advance from the label, which they have to pay back along with profit sharing.

Good for you, KOL!

Posted: January 23, 2010 at 10:40 am

Which is quite interesting.

Is this how artists will have more control over their work (and hopefully still pushing boundries without the labels intervening in a bad way?) giving the artist more freedom without fearing the album wont sell. Also leaves more responsibility with the artists instead of the labels. Really they’re only needed for distribution and publicity needs and thats really about it.

Reminds a wee bit of Becks deal with DGC/Geffen and how hes allowed to make a record with any label and they have to release it. But that was back in the days of Grunge and main-streaming of the US indie scene. Deals like that were thought to be no more. For that brief period from about 1991-1994 artists (well at least the ones that were filed under ‘Grunge’) had lot more freedom and less restrictions with what they could and couldnt do. After all being signed to Columbia or DGC wasnt most bands first label, just one that could get the CD/LP out on time.

There was a point to this post and ive seem to have lost it.